arXiv Bans Authors for AI Misuse in Academic Submissions
TL;DR. arXiv will ban authors for one year if AI-generated content is submitted without proper verification, emphasizing author responsibility. - The policy addresses issues like hallucinated references and meta-comments from LLMs in academic papers. - Authors must verify AI-generated content for existence, correctness, and accurate citation of literature. - The new rules underline the scholarly duty to maintain trust and prevent misrepresentation.
- arXiv implemented a 1-year ban for authors submitting work with unverified LLM-generated content.
- Banned authors must have subsequent arXiv submissions peer-reviewed first.
- Examples of AI misuse include hallucinated references and LLM meta-comments.
- The policy stresses author responsibility for verifying AI tool outputs.
- Scholarly integrity requires checking AI-assisted literature searches for accuracy.
Sources
- Scholarship in the Age of AI — bastian.rieck.me